INTERVENCIONISTAS ADVIERTEN A LIBIA

Top of the Agenda: UN Authorizes Military Action Against Libya

The UN Security Council voted its approval of military action (NYT) against the regime of Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi, including airstrikes against tanks and heavy artillery and the imposition of a no-flight zone. French authorities claimed an offensive could begin "within hours," and analysts expect British and French aircraft to lead the attack. However,U.S. and British officials (al-Jazeera) suggested military action would not begin until Sunday or Monday. With ten votes in favor and five abstentions, including China and Russia, the resolution supports "all necessary measures," PELIGROSA GENERALIZACIÓN short of ground invasion, to defend Libyan civilians under chapter VII of the UN charter. The decision comes as Qaddafi's emboldened forces advance toward the rebel stronghold of Benghazi. Observers say it is unclear what role the United States will play in an assault, although it is unlikely to be involved in the initial strikes (BBC). ASÍ LA HIPER AHORRA ESFUERZOS Y LOS EUROPEOS LA SIRVEN, UNA VEZ MÁS. SALVO ALEMANIA, QUE SE ABSTIENE PARA AUTOPROTEGERSE LOS DOS PARTIDOS GOBERNANTES ANTE LAS TRES ELECIONES PRÓXIMAS: LA MAYORÍA DE LOS ALEMANES, SEGÚN ENCUESTAS, ESTÁN CONTRA LA INTERVENCIÓN. TAMBIÉN SE ABSTIENEN NADA MENOS QUE RUSIA, CHINA, INDIA Y BRASIL. NATO is also set to discuss its role in the attack. TODOS LOS ATACANTES TENDRÍAN QUE HABER DISCUTIDO TAMBIÉN QUÉ HARÍAN DESPUÉS, EN UN PAÍS SIN PARTIDOS NI OTRAS FUERZAS POLITICA ORGANIADAS SALVO LAS DEL DÉSPOTA. Arab states including Qatar and UAE have vowed to support the effort. Defense analysts wonder if the decision to intervene has come too late. The Libyan army said it will surround but not invade Benghazi (FT), only sending in troops to disarm rebels. Regime spokesmen claimed the intention of Qaddafi forces is to protect Libyan citizens and food supplies.

Analysis:

In this CFR online debate, Micah Zenko and Elliott Abrams discuss the question of whether or not the United States should intervene militarily in Libya.

In this article for ForeignPolicy.com, Josh Rogin discusses classified briefings surrounding the Obama administration's "war plan for Libya."

In the Wall Street Journal, CFR's Max Boot urges U.S. military intervention in Libya.

In the Guardian, Simon Tisdall writes that Obama has "gone for broke" in Libya, and discusses the potential for political disaster and progress.

Background:

This CFR Report says the United States must improve its responsiveness to mass atrocities and, absent action by the UN, make clear its willingness to act unilaterally.